Economic Pressure on China: A Necessary Strategy for America’s Future

Hadia Zahoor

In a bold assertion of economic nationalism, Republican vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance has called for a robust international framework to monitor and exert pressure on China, particularly regarding its role in the production of fentanyl and other illicit substances. Vance’s stance reflects a growing consensus among U.S. policymakers that China’s economic practices pose significant risks not only to American jobs but also to public health and national security.

J.D. Vance emphasizes tariffs as a necessary tool against China’s “slave labor” practices affecting American workers.

With the opioid crisis claiming over 100,000 lives annually in the United States, largely due to fentanyl overdoses, the urgency of addressing this issue cannot be overstated.

Vance’s advocacy for tariffs and economic sanctions against China is grounded in the belief that the U.S. must take a hardline approach to counteract what he describes as “slave labor” practices in Chinese manufacturing. He argues that American workers cannot compete with the low wages—around $3 a day—that many Chinese laborers receive.

This stark disparity necessitates protective measures such as tariffs, which would impose financial penalties on goods produced under such conditions. Historical precedents show that tariffs have been effective in protecting domestic industries; for instance, during the late 19th century, tariffs helped build the American industrial powerhouse by ensuring fair competition for American workers.

The proposed economic pressure on China is not merely about trade; it is also a strategic maneuver to address broader geopolitical concerns. Vance has labeled China as “the biggest threat” to the United States, emphasizing that its actions—ranging from human rights abuses to aggressive territorial claims—require a coordinated international response. He suggests that U.S. diplomacy should hinge on leveraging its economic power to compel China to adhere to international norms, particularly regarding the production and exportation of fentanyl.

The opioid crisis underscores the urgency of addressing China’s role in fentanyl production linked to over 100,000 annual deaths.

Recent data underscores the gravity of the fentanyl crisis: according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), synthetic opioids like fentanyl accounted for nearly 70% of all opioid-related deaths in 2021. Much of this fentanyl is manufactured in China and smuggled into the U.S., often through Mexico. Vance’s call for tariffs aims to disrupt this supply chain by imposing economic consequences on Chinese manufacturers who fail to cooperate in curbing fentanyl production. However, implementing such a strategy is fraught with challenges.

Critics argue that increasing tariffs could lead to higher prices for American consumers, as companies pass on costs associated with tariffs on imported goods. For instance, economists have warned that broad tariffs could inflate prices across various sectors, from electronics to clothing, potentially leading to public backlash against protectionist policies. The delicate balance between safeguarding American jobs and maintaining affordable consumer goods will be a critical test for Vance and his supporters.Moreover, Vance’s approach raises questions about how far America is willing to go in redefining its relationship with China.

While he advocates for an aggressive stance, it remains essential for U.S. policymakers to consider long-term implications. A trade war could escalate tensions and lead to retaliatory measures from Beijing, further complicating an already intricate economic relationship.

Critics warn that increased tariffs could lead to higher consumer prices and complicate U.S.-China relations.

J.D. Vance’s call for economic pressure on China represents a significant shift in U.S. policy discourse, reflecting deep-seated frustrations over trade imbalances and public health crises linked to Chinese manufacturing practices. As America grapples with its reliance on Chinese goods and labor, Vance’s proposals may resonate with voters seeking change. However, navigating the complexities of international trade while protecting domestic interests will require careful consideration and strategic foresight.

Hadia Zahoor is a Lahore-based analyst and graduate of Punjab University.